patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Neshaminy School Board Members Weigh in on NFT Contract Proposal

Retiree health care benefits, employee contributions and retroactive pay still an issue for board members.

 

Tuesday evening, the Neshaminy Federation of Teachers unveiled a new contract proposal to the public and members of the press.

Though the Neshaminy School Board members didn't get the contract proposal until this morning from the board's solicitor, they have been able to review changes made by the NFT in this proposal.

Board member William O'Connor said Wednesday that he is gratified that "for the first time in three years" the NFT has agreed to contribute toward health care.

School board President Ritchie Webb said that the NFT contract proposal agrees to pay a flat rate toward health care. NFT President Louis Boyd said Tuesday that the contribution is estimated at about 8 percent toward the current health care plan, but with a flat rate contribution Webb said that if the cost of the plan goes up the teachers will still be paying the same rate.

In addition, O'Connor said he is still concerned about retroactive pay.

"It just isn’t going to be nearly enough for the district to recognize any savings," he said. According to Webb, he estimated that retroactive pay alone will cost the district $11 million. Currently, the district has a deficit in its 2011-2012 proposed budget of about $3 million.

Neshaminy is the only district around that pays full health care benefits to retirees after 10 years of service for themselves, their spouses and dependents, Webb said.

"We can no longer afford to do that," he said of the retirement health care benefits.

The new contract proposal is recommending full health care benefits to retirees after 15 years of service and is no longer extending those benefits to dependents. Webb noted that majority of retirees do not have dependents.

The NFT's new proposal, according to Webb, still includes a $27,500 retirement incentive.

"I’m not anti-teacher...but it all comes down to what can the community can pay for," Webb said. He also noted that the average household income in the Neshaminy School District is in the range of $63,000- $64,000 while the average teacher salary in the district is about $82,000.

Though Webb said he does not yet have all of the information he would like to have about the contract proposal, he noted that there are clauses in it that call for cost of living increases and does not include changes to work day hours or number of work days.

"The teachers have given us a place to start discussions, but a lot more will have to be done here," O'Connor said. 

"It needs a lot of analysis, but I view it as a starting point. There’s much in here that we just quite can’t afford," Webb said.

Boyd said Tuesday that the NFT would like to have a contract by the end of the school year. O'Connor said he thinks that is "highly unlikely" because the board has already committed to having a resident advisory panel, meeting with the union on June 13 and there are "a great many issues that going to have to be worked on."

"I think it would be difficult, but I’m certainly willing to work toward that goal," Webb said of the NFT having a contract by the end of the school year.

With the resident advisory panel's first meeting on Monday, June 6, Webb said that it is "highly unlikely" that the board would have an offer by June 13.

The NFT's new contract proposal has been posted on the Neshaminy Contract Negotiation blog, which is maintained by O'Connor.

Related Topics: Contract Negotiations, NFT, and Neshaminy School District

str8 shutr

9:39 am on Thursday, June 2, 2011

i can't believe that after stalling for 3 years that boyd wants to rush through an agreement. you should have thought about that before your people got pink slips louise. before the only ones to suffer were taxpayers and students but you didn't care about them. now your own are paying the price for your arrogance. you overplayed your hand on this one louise and all your holding are a bunch of jokers.

Reply

Bucks Dad

10:22 am on Thursday, June 2, 2011

For those just joining us, in Sep 2010 the NFT presented a proposal that adjusted down the health care package. After holding to their demands for 2+ years to keep the 100% district paid PC15 plan, it offered to reduce the cost of the program by proposing a 100% district paid PC20 program. The Board and the community still required a % of employee contributions toward health insurance premiums. This is the NFT's response to that. Instead of offering even a steady 8% contribution (which is less than half of what the district has been asking for) they offer a flat-rate contribution. The estimated savings was about $2.5 M for dropping to PC20 - including the removal of single-provider subscription. The esimated savings of this flat rate contribution is slightly less than $2.5 M while keeping the PC15 plan - including removal of single-provider subscription.

In short, this proposal would cost the district more this year and much more over the next 3 years than the NFT's prior proposal that was 100% district paid coverage. This is NOT a concession but merely a juggling of the same dollars in current-year terms. Luckily our school board is committed to a long-term solution and has kept their eyes focused on reaching real and reasonable financial agreements.

Reply

Gabriel

12:09 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011

I will reserve judgement until the board crunches the numbers but if it is true that this latest offer is just a shell game, and that the cost to the district is as high as (or higher than) the last NFT offer, then I will join the ranks of those calling for Ms. Boyd to step down. I was very pleased to see the union finally make an offer that included healthcare contributions but I am also disappointed they went with a flat amount rather than a percentage. Either way I thought this was an important development in the negotiations.

Reply

Barb K

6:48 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011

As taxpayers in the school district, we are very unhappy with the current proposal of 8% toward health care. We feel the teachers should be paying 25% of the cost (at a minimum). The public sector (us) are paying between 30-50% of the cost for our health insurance. In addition, the work day should be 8 hours... and as for tenure; it needs to be disolved. Reward the good teachers and remove the poor teachers.

Reply

Leave a comment